The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UG · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BCPC | CL | TGLS | UG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 74 (highest) | 74 (highest) | 74 (highest) | 73 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 93 | 60 | 95 (highest) | — |
| Pricing power | 54 | 100 (highest) | 53 | 60 |
| Returns on capital | 58 | 100 (highest) | 64 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 58 | 96 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 63 (highest) | 52 | 60 | 30 |
| 332% above value if growth stopped today | 198% above value if growth stopped today | 14% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 20% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $5.2B | $72.7B | $2.0B | $35M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |