The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
JBHT · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BDC | VMI | JBHT | CNXN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) | 62 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 83 (highest) | 83 (highest) | 32 | 60 |
| Pricing power | 57 (highest) | 40 | — | 22 |
| Returns on capital | 39 | 47 | 79 (highest) | 53 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 72 | 59 | 66 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 56 | 80 (highest) | 71 | 72 |
| 52% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 236% above value if growth stopped today | 237% above value if growth stopped today | 112% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $4.0B | $9.5B | $27.3B | $2.0B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |