The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EMN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
WTI · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BDCO | EMN | PROP | WTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) | 31 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 21 | 26 | 70 (highest) | 25 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 39 (highest) | 6 | — |
| Returns on capital | 83 (highest) | 46 | 9 | 59 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | — | 28 (highest) | 10 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 14 | 44 (highest) | 31 |
| No price data | 60% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $64.2M | $15.3B | $50M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |