The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BEN · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HNNA · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ABX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

COIN · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBENHNNAABXCOIN
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)49
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend325357 (highest)31
Pricing power——100—
Returns on capital6493 (highest)2438
Balance-sheet safety6637992 (highest)
Capital allocation371760 (highest)33
63% above value if growth stopped today3% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)210% above value if growth stopped today222% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$16.0B$81M$765M$45.1B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025