The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BEN · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HNNA · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ABX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ICE · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBENHNNAABXICE
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)48
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend32535762 (highest)
Pricing power100
Returns on capital6493 (highest)2418
Balance-sheet safety66 (highest)37925
Capital allocation37176085 (highest)
73% above value if growth stopped todayAround the value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)310% above value if growth stopped today91% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$16.9B$77.5M$1.0B$82.7B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025