The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BETA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
MIBE · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BETA | TTSH | LESL | MIBE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | 25 | 16 | 30 |
| Pricing power | 90 | 99 (highest) | 64 | 89 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 21 | 88 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 35 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 40 (highest) | 24 | — |
| No price data | 34% below value if growth stopped today | 96% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.4B | $118M | $11.5M | $37.4M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 |