The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BFRI · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GRAL · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VVOS · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CLSDQ · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureBFRIGRALVVOSCLSDQ
Moat Score (0–100)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)41 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend63 (highest)63 (highest)4228
Pricing power8995 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)2855 (highest)
Capital discipline44 (highest)44 (highest)44 (highest)24
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$12.2M$3.8M$19.1M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2024