The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BIAF · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OPLN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BIAF | VSEC | OPLN | GO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 57 | 32 | 24 | 58 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | — | 54 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 9 (highest) | 6 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 37 | 58 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 1 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 1250% above high estimate | 142% above high estimate | 32% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $3.1M | $4.6B | $4.1B | $910.9M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |