The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BINI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ABSI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DXYN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FUNI · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBINIABSIDXYNFUNI
Moat Score (0–100)20 (highest)20 (highest)20 (highest)20 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend030 (highest)20
Pricing power134 (highest)29
Returns on capital004 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)28028
Capital allocation44 (highest)2444 (highest)24
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$343298Not reportedNot reported$2.8M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2024FY2025FY2025FY2025