The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BKH · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

YORW · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ES · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

UGI · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBKHYORWESUGI
Moat Score (0–100)32 (highest)32 (highest)32 (highest)31
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend627685 (highest)29
Pricing power
Returns on capital312029 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety2215 (highest)
Capital allocation60394163 (highest)
95% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)102% above value if growth stopped today106% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$5.7B$450M$28.1BNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025