The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RELY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BL | ASUR | QRVO | RELY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 60 | 25 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 90 | 61 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 11 (highest) | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 29 | 23 | 37 | 75 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 60 | 100 (highest) | 24 |
| 146% above value if growth stopped today | 100% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 141% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.7B | $215M | $7.6B | $4.7B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |