The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STRA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EUBG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BLBD | STRA | EUBG | BJRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 76 | 55 | 73 |
| Pricing power | 0 | — | 91 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 93 (highest) | 11 | — | 10 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 93 |
| Capital allocation | 60 | 80 (highest) | 20 | 57 |
| 599% above value if growth stopped today | 92% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 350% above value if growth stopped today | 546% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $2.4B | $1.7B | $74.4M | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |