The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLGO · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BLGO | COTY | MLKN | DYNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 | 33 (highest) | 32 | 32 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 40 | 54 | 55 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 68 | 99 (highest) | 63 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 18 (highest) | 12 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 0 | 12 | 37 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 34 | 24 | 16 | 56 (highest) |
| No price data | 5% below value if growth stopped today | 17% above value if growth stopped today | 56% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $2.8B | $1.5B | $18.5M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 |