The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MTSI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
HOLO · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BLIN | AVNW | MTSI | HOLO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 43 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | — |
| Pricing power | 88 (highest) | 50 | 79 | 67 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 7 | 0 | 18 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 76 (highest) | 72 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 92% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1404% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $14.4M | $257M | $19.9B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2022 |