The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLIS · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BLIS | LINK | TENB | RPAY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | — | 55 | 65 (highest) | 58 |
| Pricing power | 70 | 73 | 98 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 8 (highest) | 0 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 80628% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $4M | $54M | Not reported | $329.6B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |