The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLMH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OXM · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
ATMU · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
| Measure | BLMH | OXM | ATMU | TTEK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 | 68 (highest) | 67 | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 54 | 81 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 64 | 96 (highest) | 42 | 20 |
| Returns on capital | — | 68 | 100 (highest) | 73 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 96 (highest) | 55 | 58 | 57 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 64 | 56 | 91 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 41% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data | 58% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $2.3M | $610.4M | — | $8.2B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2024 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |