The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLPG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
FORR · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
IVDN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | BLPG | FORR | PETS | IVDN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) | 52 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 73 | 41 | 31 | 85 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 64 | 97 (highest) | 48 | 47 |
| Returns on capital | — | 30 | 90 (highest) | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 (highest) | 37 | 36 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 87% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 5% below high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $462008 | $189.6M | $41.9M | $10.5M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |