The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BMY · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

PTCT · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

PGNY · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RIGL · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureBMYPTCTPGNYRIGL
Moat Score (0–100)60 (highest)60 (highest)60 (highest)60 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5775 (highest)6975 (highest)
Pricing power98100 (highest)3099
Returns on capital058 (highest)8
Balance-sheet safety33100 (highest)100 (highest)92
Capital discipline50 (highest)244224
Price vs. high estimate27% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate)No price data300% above high estimateNo price data
Market cap$126.4B$6.3B$2.6B$673M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025