The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BNGO · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

NXTS · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SKVI · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VSTM · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBNGONXTSSKVIVSTM
Moat Score (0–100)34 (highest)34 (highest)34 (highest)34 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5001363 (highest)
Pricing power1970 (highest)70 (highest)
Returns on capital0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)2828
Capital allocation44 (highest)44 (highest)2444 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$11.9M$5M$1.1M$470M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025