The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BNTC · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GTHP · Healthcare · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BNTC | GTHP | DERM | OSUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 36 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 60 (highest) | 33 | 20 |
| Pricing power | — | 15 | 91 (highest) | 72 |
| Returns on capital | 12 (highest) | — | 7 | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $279M | $16.4M | $122M | $254M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |