The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BNTC · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

IRD · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SEER · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

EUDA · Healthcare · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBNTCIRDSEEREUDA
Moat Score (0–100)40 (highest)40 (highest)40 (highest)40 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend505060 (highest)0
Pricing power56 (highest)55
Returns on capital12 (highest)12 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)55 (highest)
Capital allocation44443051 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$293M$215MNot reported$22.5M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2022