The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BOTX · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RMTG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BOTX | PII | RMTG | DIBS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 54 | 60 | 51 |
| Pricing power | 39 | 38 | 62 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 69 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 32 | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 60 | 64 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 17% below high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | — | $4.1B | $1.4M | $169.9M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |