The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BOX · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BR | CSCO | CRDO | BOX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) | 71 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 97 (highest) | 58 | 80 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 46 | 100 (highest) | 88 | 98 |
| Returns on capital | 85 | 96 (highest) | 7 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 44 | 47 | 100 (highest) | 60 |
| Capital allocation | 82 (highest) | 56 | 80 | 49 |
| 132% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 280% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 159% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $17.4B | $452.1B | $39.5B | $4.1B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |