The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BRLS · Consumer Staples · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

BRFH · Consumer Staples · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SOWG · Consumer Staples · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BRID · Consumer Staples · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBRLSBRFHSOWGBRID
Moat Score (0–100)2830 (highest)2827
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend4063 (highest)60
Pricing power033 (highest)831
Returns on capital006 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital allocation44 (highest)2444 (highest)44 (highest)
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market capNot reported$27.9M$38.5M$58.4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025