The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BRQSF · Technology · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BRQSF | WAST | RBBN | PL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) | 38 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 30 | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 28 | 89 (highest) | 81 | 53 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 | 28 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 36 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 92% below high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $3.2M | $1.7M | $356M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2017 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |