The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

BRZE · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GDYN · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WK · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FUSE · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureBRZEGDYNWKFUSE
Moat Score (0–100)53 (highest)53 (highest)53 (highest)53 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend6580 (highest)6020
Pricing power99 (highest)6199 (highest)93
Returns on capital09 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety55 (highest)55 (highest)2855 (highest)
Capital allocation4459 (highest)2443
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$2.5B$483M$2.9B$25.7M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025