The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
KNX · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BTOC | QURT | MTUS | KNX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) | 29 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 (highest) | 13 | 25 | 46 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 28 (highest) | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 18 (highest) | 14 | 0 | 8 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 78 (highest) | 34 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 37 | 44 (highest) | 28 |
| No price data | 6915% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 339% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $139M | $5.7M | Not reported | $10.6B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |