The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BUKS · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | BUKS | TMUS | NFLX | KUBR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 75 | 85 (highest) | 82 | 73 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 93 | 97 (highest) | 60 |
| Pricing power | — | 100 (highest) | 54 | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 48 | 73 | 86 | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 87 | 100 (highest) | 87 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 81 | 60 | 84 (highest) | 36 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 34% above high estimate | 6% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 193% above high estimate | No price data |
| Market cap | $301.8M | $216.6B | $285.4B | — |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2024 |