The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AISP · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CACI | VPG | AISP | LAWIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 28 | 48 | 63 |
| Pricing power | 27 | 67 | 73 | 88 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 19 | 29 (highest) | — | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 6 | 68 (highest) | 55 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 99 (highest) | 59 | 24 | 95 |
| 163% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 18% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $13.5B | Not reported | $72.5M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |