The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CAH · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RS · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

INSW · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ROP · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureCAHRSINSWROP
Moat Score (0–100)54 (highest)54 (highest)54 (highest)54 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend83266589 (highest)
Pricing power145197 (highest)
Returns on capital54 (highest)42145
Balance-sheet safety5368 (highest)5828
Capital allocation6685 (highest)8051
349% above value if growth stopped today36% above value if growth stopped today27% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)133% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$52.4B$20.2B$5.5B$39.7B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025