The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PENN · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CANN | MXCT | LSEB | PENN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 (highest) | 19 | 20 | 43 |
| Pricing power | 65 | 89 (highest) | 88 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) | 24 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $1.7M | $139M | Not reported | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |