The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FRGT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
JBLU · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CAPS | FRGT | JBLU | SCWO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | 20 | 60 (highest) | 10 |
| Pricing power | 34 (highest) | — | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 9 (highest) | 0 | 7 | 4 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 45 (highest) | 24 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $2M | $6.6M | $1.9B | $37M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |