The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CAST · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
ANKM · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CAST | ANKM | PSN | ATKR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 70 | 95 (highest) | 19 |
| Pricing power | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) | 40 | 25 |
| Returns on capital | — | — | 8 | 88 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 51 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 43 | 24 | 80 (highest) | 40 |
| No price data | No price data | 13% below value if growth stopped today | 52% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $46.2M | Not reported | $2.3B | $3.2B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |