The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CCK · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PSIX · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | CCK | BDC | PSIX | SKAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 | 57 (highest) | 56 | 55 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 69 | 58 | 81 (highest) | 23 |
| Pricing power | — | 57 | 2 | 62 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 52 | 39 | 87 (highest) | 80 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 24 | 72 | 84 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital discipline | 76 (highest) | 56 | 24 | 55 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 54% above high estimate | 47% above high estimate | 136% above high estimate | 52% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) |
| Market cap | $13.0B | $3.9B | $688.9M | $6.7M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |