CROWN HOLDINGS, INC.

CCK · Industrials · $13.4B mkt cap · FY2025 filings · Shallow moat ·

Doesn't clear the bar

Shallow moat
Share / Embed this score
Embed this score

The five investor questions

54

2021–2025 (latest 5 aligned FYs; v3 window cap 5): revenue $11.4B to $12.4B, increasing; diluted EPS -4.30 to 6.38, increasing.

Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power.

52

Median ROIC 12.2%, above the 12% hurdle in 60% of years.

24

Net debt/EBITDA 2.6x, interest coverage 4x.

76

Owner earnings changed +5.2%/yr over up to the ten most recent annual observations.

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

Price vs. value if growth stopped today

A cautious baseline, not a price target: what the shares may support if normalized owner earnings simply hold steady.

Above value if growth stopped todayBelow value if growth stopped today
157% above value if growth stopped today
$469M
$45.94
$74.43
$117.88
157% above value if growth stopped today

What today’s price assumes: owner earnings growing ~21%/yr over 5 years. The zero-growth estimate assumes owner earnings stay flat (0% growth).

How to read this

We solve for the constant annual change in owner earnings that would make the five-year zero-growth estimate equal today’s price. This keeps the existing model inputs and calculation unchanged; it is an expectations lens, not a forecast.

This zero-growth estimate assumes trailing owner earnings persist — unreliable for declining businesses. The recent FY revenue series does not trigger the three-consecutive-declines flag.

Among the current top-score group, the median current price is 239% above the zero-growth estimate across 48 of the current top 50 companies by Moat Score with both values.

Score records captured Jul 26, 2026.

Exactly which 50 companies?

FTNT, META, MEDP, IBEX, MSFT, GOOGL, LULU, ANF, IDXX, TXRH, FHI, QLYS, FFIV, ADBE, LLY, MANH, VEEV, GRMN, SSD, MNST, DOCS, MCO, CPRT, NTAP, LRCX, NVDA, CORT, SFM, MPTI, ULTA, SN, RMD, ROL, PAYC, IRMD, INTU, DECK, MORN, LGCY, DAL, GWW, ISRG, MPWR, CTAS, LOPE, MRK, CMG, FAST, BKNG, ORLY

Missing a usable price or zero-growth estimate: ANF, BKNG.

Model details under moat-index@3.0.0: zero-growth multiple 11.1×, capped-growth comparison at no more than 18×; 9% discount rate; high-end growth 4% (capped at 4%) using min(5y revenue CAGR, 5y diluted-EPS CAGR), clamped to 0%–4%; maintenance capex uses min(capex, D&A); abstain when D&A is unavailable. This is a disclosed model range, not intrinsic value as fact.

19 years of fundamentals

The business, in plain English

Across the filed record, revenue grew from $8.3B (FY2008) to $12.4B (FY2025) — about 2.4% a year compounded over 17 years.

It earned 14.4% on invested capital in the latest filed year, FY2025. Across the full 13-year measurable filed record, median ROIC was 13.3%. Over the v3 recent window (10 measurable filed years), median ROIC was 12.2%. The Returns on Capital filter above scores it 52/100.

The balance sheet carried $6.0B of total debt in FY2025 against $781M of owner earnings — roughly 7.6 years of owner earnings to retire it all. Balance-Sheet Safety scores it 24/100.

This breakdown is generated from the filed numbers and sub-scores above — no outside narrative, no estimates. Where a filing doesn’t disclose an input, the sentence that would need it is omitted instead of guessed.

FY2007–FY2025 · 19 fiscal years, normalized from CCK’s SEC filings

Sales, as filed$12.4B FY2025
$0$5B$10B2007201320192025
Revenue kept after cost of goods15.2% FY2014
0%200%400%2007201320192025
Standard ROIC or separately labeled Operating ROICROIC 14.4% FY2025
0%10%20%2007201320192025
Cash an owner could take out$781M FY2025
$02007201320192025

Gaps in a line mean that item isn’t in CCK’s filings for that year. The series is never interpolated or estimated. The Table view lists every filed value, including operating and net margins, total debt, and share count.

Visual explainers

The filing-backed explainer service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed chart is shown.

Moat Score history

16 logged readings since Jul 17, 2026 · append-only, never rewritten

Moat Score over timeLast scored reading of each day, on the 0–100 scale51.6 / 100
0406080100WideNarrowShallowNo moatJul 20, 2026Jul 26, 2026

Breaks in the line mark methodology or normalizer upgrades — readings across versions aren’t compared, so a level shift there isn’t a change in the business.

Tier changesSame-methodology and same-normalizer crossings of the Wide / Narrow / Shallow bars

  1. Normalizer upgraded unstamped (version unknown)tomoat-xbrl-normalizer@1.1.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 26, 2026
  2. Methodology upgraded moat-index@2.0.0tomoat-index@3.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 23, 2026
  3. Methodology upgraded moat-index@1.2.0tomoat-index@2.0.0 — readings across versions aren’t comparedJul 20, 2026

Scores are logged append-only and never overwritten — this record cannot be reconstructed retroactively, which is exactly why it’s worth keeping.

Insider activity

Form 4 reports mix P/S market or private transactions with compensation-plan mechanics. Activity casually described as “insider selling” can include compensation mechanics; awards, tax withholding, and option exercises are shown by their exact filed class here, never collapsed into “Bought” or “Sold.”

These are disclosed filing facts and arithmetic aggregates, not a signal or verdict.

The insider-filing service is temporarily unavailable, so no partial or guessed answer is shown for CCK.

Industrials context

#154 of 428 scored Industrials companies, ranked by Moat Score.

Nearest peers by Moat Score

  1. #152HUBG HUB GROUP, INC.52.0 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  2. #153GNRC GENERAC HOLDINGS INC.51.7 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  3. #155VTOL Bristow Group Inc.51.6 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat
  4. #156TKR TIMKEN CO51.5 out of 100, Shallow moatShallow moat

Compare CCK with its nearest peersAll Industrials companies on the Index →

Common questions about CCK

Does CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. have an economic moat?
Based on its FY2025 SEC filings, the Moat Index scores CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK) 51.6 out of 100 — a Shallow moat. The five questions behind that score begin at 20% each; if exactly one genuinely lacks data, the other four weights are renormalized and disclosed. revenue and EPS trend 54, pricing power not measurable from the filings, returns on capital 52, balance-sheet safety 24, capital allocation 76.
Is CCK trading below the conservative owner-earnings estimate?
The value if growth stopped today — a zero-growth baseline — is $45.94 per share. It capitalizes normalized owner earnings at a 9% rate and assumes 0% growth. Versus a recent price of $117.88, that is 157% above value if growth stopped today. The model also publishes a capped-growth comparison, but the zero-growth estimate is the cautious baseline. It assumes trailing owner earnings persist and is unreliable for declining businesses. This is an educational estimate from primary SEC filings, not intrinsic value as a fact or investment advice.
How has CCK's Moat Score changed over time?
The record logs 16 readings since Jul 17, 2026; the latest reads 51.6 out of 100 (shallow moat). No tier changes on record yet. (Methodology or normalizer upgrades on Jul 20, 2026, Jul 23, 2026, Jul 26, 2026 re-based the score; readings across versions aren't compared.) The history is append-only — readings are only ever added, never rewritten.