The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CCL · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

TKLS · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

RNGE · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ESYN · Industrials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCCLTKLSRNGEESYN
Moat Score (0–100)33 (highest)33 (highest)33 (highest)33 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend85 (highest)603520
Pricing power3502459 (highest)
Returns on capital15 (highest)—6—
Balance-sheet safety102855 (highest)28
Capital allocation1744 (highest)44 (highest)24
No price dataNo price data460% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$32.7B$8.4M$64M$14.8M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025