The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RBRK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CCSI | ATEN | DIOD | RBRK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 56 | 57 (highest) | 56 | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 38 | 20 | 57 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 54 | 96 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 74 | 42 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 21 | 37 | 82 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 20 | 33 | 82 (highest) | 44 |
| 29% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 259% above value if growth stopped today | 68% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $662M | $1.9B | $4.2B | $21.0B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 |