The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CPK · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EIX · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CETY | CWST | CPK | EIX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 39 (highest) | 38 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 55 | 87 (highest) | 83 |
| Pricing power | 39 | 58 (highest) | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 5 (highest) | 5 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 17 | 4 | 8 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) |
| No price data | 994% above value if growth stopped today | 213% above value if growth stopped today | 61% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $9.1M | $5.5B | $3.1B | $21.4B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |