The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BICX · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CFOR | RGEN | BICX | XTNT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 80 (highest) | 40 | 60 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 49 | 85 | 70 | 96 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 6 | 11 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 73 (highest) | 56 | 28 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | 542% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $183M | $7.4B | $7.3M | $60M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |