The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CHH · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CHH | DRI | TDG | URBN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 77 | 78 (highest) | 78 (highest) | 77 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 | 94 | 100 (highest) | 91 |
| Pricing power | — | 31 | 93 (highest) | 50 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 97 | 75 | 80 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 12 | 72 | 40 | 73 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 94 | 80 | 89 |
| 53% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 96% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 82% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $5.1B | $22.4B | Not reported | $6.3B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |