The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CIRX · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CIRX | MDLZ | FRPT | PRMB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 38 | 40 (highest) | 40 (highest) | 37 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 28 | 50 | 80 (highest) | 78 |
| Pricing power | 73 (highest) | 60 | 58 | 40 |
| Returns on capital | — | 5 | 0 | 15 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 12 | 36 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 75 (highest) | 24 | 53 |
| No price data | 66% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | 257% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $128779 | $81.9B | $3.3B | $7.2B |
| Moat tier | No moat | Shallow moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |