The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
OMTK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STKS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CISO | OMTK | STKS | DLPN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 22 | 23 (highest) | 22 | 22 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | — | 50 | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 8 | 38 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 0 | 14 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 8% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $11.7M | $219481 | $56.5M | $13.1M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |