The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
PED · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CITR | DYNR | CLF | PED |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 50 | 55 (highest) | 20 | 55 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 52 (highest) | 0 | 1 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 12 | 67 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 37 (highest) | 28 | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 29 | 56 (highest) | 44 | 44 |
| No price data | 56% below value if growth stopped today | 14% below value if growth stopped today | 58% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $94.3M | $18.5M | $6.8B | $57.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |