The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RSRV · Materials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SLVM · Materials · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CLB | AXIL | RSRV | SLVM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 54 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 81 (highest) | 80 | — | 44 |
| Pricing power | 36 | 80 | 90 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 42 | 18 | 4 | 91 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 46 | 73 (highest) | 73 (highest) | 42 |
| Capital allocation | 67 (highest) | 24 | 52 | 40 |
| 41% above value if growth stopped today | 104% above value if growth stopped today | 62% above value if growth stopped today | 50% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $519M | $42M | $35.8M | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |