The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLGO · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CLF | BLGO | DYNR | CITR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) | 32 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 20 | — | 55 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 1 | 68 (highest) | 0 | 52 |
| Returns on capital | 67 (highest) | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 28 | 37 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 34 | 56 (highest) | 29 |
| 14% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | 56% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | |
| Market cap | $6.8B | Not reported | $18.5M | $94.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |