The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CLNV · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SNES · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

EXE · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OVV · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCLNVSNESEXEOVV
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend2065 (highest)2525
Pricing power72 (highest)43
Returns on capital0944 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety282865 (highest)36
Capital allocation2444 (highest)44 (highest)37
No price dataNo price dataNo price dataAround the value if growth stopped today
Market cap$4.1M$7.3MNot reported$16.0B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2024FY2025FY2025FY2025