The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CLRI · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OSW · Communications · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CLRI | GLXZ | OSW | PRKA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 | 69 (highest) | 67 | 67 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 60 | 80 (highest) | 58 |
| Pricing power | 96 | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | — | 97 (highest) | 39 | 77 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 78 (highest) | 13 | 77 | 73 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 77 (highest) | 73 | 25 |
| 97% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 330% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 264% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.2M | $41.6M | Not reported | $29.4M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |