The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CMG · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LGCY · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

LOPE · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

FAST · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat

Wide moat

On the watchlist

MeasureCMGLGCYLOPEFAST
Moat Score (0–100)8990 (highest)8989
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend65100 (highest)8492
Pricing power———78
Returns on capital97100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)100 (highest)
Capital allocation95 (highest)607376
185% above value if growth stopped today87% above value if growth stopped today84% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)358% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$38.9B$131M$4.4B$58.6B
Moat tierWide moatWide moatWide moatWide moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025