The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SLB · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MGY · Materials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | CMPR | CSW | SLB | MGY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 69 | 70 (highest) | 70 (highest) | 69 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 68 | 95 (highest) | 95 (highest) | 45 |
| Pricing power | 82 | 75 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 42 | 56 | 20 | 88 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 53 | 50 | — | 98 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 100 (highest) | 75 | 65 | 45 |
| 161% above value if growth stopped today | 243% above value if growth stopped today | 59% above value if growth stopped today | 8% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $2.0B | $4.7B | $76.4B | $4.7B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |