The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

CMPR · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SLVM · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

REX · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SD · Materials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureCMPRSLVMREXSD
Moat Score (0–100)54 (highest)54 (highest)54 (highest)54 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend69 (highest)446131
Pricing power80 (highest)0
Returns on capital2891 (highest)34
Balance-sheet safety494278100 (highest)
Capital allocation404076 (highest)49
221% above value if growth stopped today46% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)102% above value if growth stopped today35% below value if growth stopped today
Market cap$2.4B$1.5B$1.5B$509M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2026FY2025